Float by Float
Float helps teams in resource management software by giving them one practical place to keep work moving. It is most useful when ownership, handoffs, and deadlines are already defi...
Resource Management Software
Wrike reviews and summary
Wrike is an enterprise-grade resource and project management software designed to provide comprehensive visibility and control over work at scale. It offers a unified platform for resource management and allocation, performance reporting, Gantt charts, time tracking, and workload overviews. With deep integration capabilities (400+ applications), customizable workflows, and tools to reduce reliance on emails and status meetings, Wrike enables organizations to streamline processes, optimize resource use, and accelerate execution across the entire company. Wrike is built for mid-to-large-sized companies and enterprises with complex projects and distributed teams that require robust resource planning, cross-departmental visibility, and scalable work auto...
Best for
Wrike is built for mid-to-large-sized companies and enterprises with complex projects and distributed teams that require robust resource planning, cross-departmental visibility, and scalable work automation. It is trusted by departments like marketing, professional services, IT, and product development.
Starting price
$9.80 Per-Month
Category
Resource Management Software
Vendor
Wrike
Key takeaways
Our verdict
Wrike is a formidable enterprise solution that excels at bringing order and efficiency to complex work environments. Its strong emphasis on resource management, combined with extensive integrations and customization, makes it a top choice for large organizations seeking to improve planning and operational agility.
Quick facts
Wrike at a glance
Overall rating
4.2/5
Reviews
1.7K
Starting price
$9.80 Per-Month
Vendor
Wrike
Founded
2007
Location
United States
Category
Resource Management Software
Ratings
Wrike ratings
Ratings in this section summarize available rating data. Software reviews are shown separately when users submit reviews.
Decision notes
Wrike pros and cons
Potential strengths
- Clear routines around ownership can reduce dropped items when teams use Wrike every day.
- Useful when teams need a dependable baseline for communication, files, or task movement.
- Good for teams that prioritize fast adoption before adding custom process layers.
Points to verify
- Are roles, review steps, and approvals already explicit for this workflow?
- Do you need tighter controls immediately, or is speed of adoption more important in the first weeks?
- Can this replace another current workflow without creating duplicate entry points?
Buyer fit
Who uses Wrike?
Wrike is built for mid-to-large-sized companies and enterprises with complex projects and distributed teams that require robust resource planning, cross-departmental visibility, and scalable work automation. It is trusted by departments like marketing, professional services, IT, and product development.
Feature research
Wrike features
These are common features buyers compare in Resource Management Software. Product-specific availability should be confirmed with the vendor.
Resource Capacity Planning
Analyze demand trends to ensure resources are sufficient for current and future operational needs.
Team Collaboration Suite
Features that enable team members to exchange files, message, and co-author projects in real-time.
Drag-and-Drop Interface
Build custom workflows and apps by simply moving and placing modular interface elements.
Predictive Forecasting
Predict future outcomes using historical data and current market trends.
Managerial Project Oversight Dashboards
Visual reports and dashboards offering managers insights into task/project status, costs, and other crucial data.
Resource Allocation Planning
Plan and assign resources such as equipment, machinery, parts, and materials.
Advanced Search & Filtering
Navigate through available data using specific queries and parameters to find necessary information.
Employee Skill Monitoring
Monitors employee skills, competencies, training records, and qualifications.
Asset Usage Analytics
Generate reports on how frequently specific assets are utilized.
Pricing
Wrike pricing
Starting price
$9.80 Per-Month
Visit Website
Pricing model: Per User
Pricing can change. Confirm current plans and terms with the vendor.
Compare
Wrike alternatives
Compare Wrike with other Resource Management Software tools that buyers often evaluate.
Teamwork by Teamwork.com
Teamwork fits in-house teams and agencies that manage client projects across planning, delivery, and post-project reporting and want one workspace for collaboration and accountabil...
Targetprocess by Targetprocess
Targetprocess is aimed at medium and large organizations scaling Agile across portfolios, programs, and teams. It is worth checking when SAFe support and Azure DevOps links are cen...
Celoxis by Celoxis Technologies
Celoxis suits teams that need project, portfolio, resource, risk, issue, and workflow management with strong reporting. Buyers should check how much customization they can manage w...
Hive by Hive Technology
Hive gives teams one place for projects, resource planning, messages, email, and files. It is a fit to examine when work is spread across too many apps and each team wants a differ...
Ganttic by Ganttic
Ganttic helps teams plan people, projects, equipment, and other shared resources with Gantt, Kanban, reporting, and graph views. It is worth testing if overbooking and portfolio vi...
Rentman by Rentman
Rentman is built for AV rental, event production, and party equipment companies that need to manage gear, crew, and client projects from one dashboard. It combines equipment tracki...
teamdeck by apptension
teamdeck, developed by apptension, is a cloud-based resource management tool designed to help teams plan, schedule, and track their workforce efficiently. It consolidates features...
Software reviews
Wrike software reviews
No software reviews yet
No software reviews have been submitted for Wrike yet.
Write the first review
FAQ
Wrike FAQs
Teams that need steadier execution in this area and want fewer handoff breaks usually benefit first.
Start with one core workflow for one team and compare completion quality after one cycle.
Adoption depends on habits. Set ownership, naming, and approval rules before scaling.
It can replace fragmented steps for some teams, but keep legacy flow available for the first transition period.
Check who owns setup, where updates land, and how notifications are distributed.
Measure usage and completion signals after one sprint, then adjust before broader rollout.
Trust and data
How we build software profiles
Catalog data
Software profiles can include software facts and public catalog information.
User reviews
Software reviews are submitted by users and moderated before publication.
Vendor updates
Claimed vendors can update profile details and respond to reviews.
This profile can include catalog facts, aggregate ratings, submitted software reviews, and vendor profile updates when available.
For Vendors
Manage this software profile
Claim this profile to update pricing, screenshots, features, and respond to reviews.