Microsoft 365 by Microsoft
Microsoft 365 is a practical choice when your team needs a connected business productivity workflow and less workflow switching. It tends to work best when ownership, review rhythm...
Collaboration Software
Asana reviews and summary
Asana is a powerful collaboration and work management platform that helps teams coordinate all their work, from routine daily tasks to large-scale strategic projects. It connects work in a single, unified space, enabling teams to collaborate effectively regardless of location. The platform offers multiple views to organize work, including lists, boards, calendars, and Gantt charts, providing flexibility to match various workflows. Trusted by over 114,000 paying organizations and millions of teams globally, Asana is designed for quick setup and ease of use. Asana is built for teams and organizations of all sizes across industries—from small startups to large enterprises—that need to improve project visibility, task delegation, and cross-functional col...
Best for
Asana is built for teams and organizations of all sizes across industries—from small startups to large enterprises—that need to improve project visibility, task delegation, and cross-functional collaboration to enhance productivity.
Starting price
$13.49 Per-Month
Category
Collaboration Software
Vendor
Asana
Key takeaways
Our verdict
Our verdict is that Asana is a top-tier work management solution that excels in bringing clarity and structure to team collaboration. Its versatile views, extensive integration ecosystem, and widespread adoption make it an excellent choice for teams aiming to streamline workflows and achieve better project outcomes.
Quick facts
Asana at a glance
Overall rating
3.6/5
Reviews
5
Starting price
$13.49 Per-Month
Vendor
Asana
Founded
2008
Location
United States
Category
Collaboration Software
Ratings
Asana ratings
Ratings in this section are based on submitted software reviews.
Decision notes
Asana pros and cons
Potential strengths
- Works well for teams that want one place to keep routine work visible.
- Supports faster iteration when responsibilities and review steps are clearly defined.
- Fits businesses that value practical workflows over complex configuration at the start.
Points to verify
- Do your teams already agree on ownership and decision rules for this area of work?
- Is your team ready for the permission and sharing model that comes with day-to-day use?
- Will this tool reduce handoffs for your current team pattern, or add another handoff point?
Buyer fit
Who uses Asana?
Asana is built for teams and organizations of all sizes across industries—from small startups to large enterprises—that need to improve project visibility, task delegation, and cross-functional collaboration to enhance productivity.
Feature research
Asana features
These are common features buyers compare in Collaboration Software. Product-specific availability should be confirmed with the vendor.
Brainstorming
Helps buyers judge whether brainstorming fits the way their team handles collaboration work.
Calendar Management
Helps teams coordinate dates, availability, assignments, and follow-up without moving scheduling work into a separate system.
Contact Management
Keeps person or account details tied to the work they affect, instead of leaving context scattered across notes and inboxes.
Content Management
Keeps important files and records close to the workflow, with easier search, review, and handoff between teams.
Discussions / Forums
Helps buyers judge whether discussions or forums fits the way their team handles collaboration work.
Document Management
Keeps important files and records close to the workflow, with easier search, review, and handoff between teams.
Project Management
Helps buyers judge whether project management fits the way their team handles collaboration work.
Real Time Editing
Helps buyers judge whether real time editing fits the way their team handles collaboration work.
Task Management
Makes handoffs and approvals easier to follow, especially when several people need to move work from request to resolution.
Version Control
Helps buyers judge whether version control fits the way their team handles collaboration work.
Video Conferencing
Helps buyers judge whether video conferencing fits the way their team handles collaboration work.
Pricing
Asana pricing
Starting price
$13.49 Per-Month
Visit Website
Pricing model: Per User
Pricing can change. Confirm current plans and terms with the vendor.
Compare
Asana alternatives
Compare Asana with other Collaboration Software tools that buyers often evaluate.
ConnectWise Control by ConnectWise
ConnectWise Control helps teams in collaboration software by giving them one practical place to keep work moving. It is most useful when ownership, handoffs, and deadlines are alre...
Autodesk Construction Cloud by Autodesk
Autodesk Construction Cloud helps teams in collaboration software by giving them one practical place to keep work moving. It is most useful when ownership, handoffs, and deadlines...
Workplace by Facebook by Facebook
Workplace by Facebook helps teams in collaboration software by giving them one practical place to keep work moving. It is most useful when ownership, handoffs, and deadlines are al...
OnBoard by OnBoard
OnBoard helps teams in collaboration software by giving them one practical place to keep work moving. It is most useful when ownership, handoffs, and deadlines are already defined,...
Bluebeam Revu by Bluebeam Software
Bluebeam Revu is commonly used by teams that live in PDFs and need to annotate, mark up, and review deliverables with less back-and-forth. It is useful when design review speed mat...
Blackboard Collaborate by Blackboard
Blackboard Collaborate is aimed at live learning and training, not just routine video meetings. Shortlist it when instructors need virtual classroom tools such as breakout rooms, w...
Lucidspark by Lucid Software
Lucidspark gives teams a shared virtual whiteboard for brainstorming, organizing notes, voting on ideas, and turning rough thinking into clearer workflows or presentation-ready con...
Software reviews
Asana software reviews
Search, filter, and read submitted software reviews.
Filter Reviews
Star rating
Review Time
Useful work platform for daily operations - Keeps projects moving with less effort!
Asana keeps shared work visible. During a busy handover, Asana lets me organise work in list, board, calendar or Gantt views, keeping shared tasks easier. Integration fit still needs checking across all teams here first. Admin controls and data exports matter in our operation; I need confidence before relying on them. As implementation owner, I find the workspace capable, but its breadth requires setup and ownership.
Coordination across routine work and larger projects is proving useful in daily operations. Still, integration fit, permission boundaries and export handling need validation against operational requirements.
I am keeping tasks together, and the different views help colleagues see progress in one shared place across routine work and larger projects. That visibility is useful, though administration remains a concern for rollout. Asana is giving us a flexible base for coordination, provided the operational checks around access and exports hold up consistently.
Date of experience: Oct 02, 2026
Work review
The workspace is easy to learn, and its different views keep routine work visible across the team.
Setup still takes planning when we are matching the platform to an existing workflow, despite its quick initial setup options.
With work in one place, lists, boards, calendars and Gantt charts give the team more flexibility — though keeping projects consistently organised still needs attention.
Date of experience: Oct 01, 2026
Clearer work, with a handoff to watch
During a busy week of property viewings, I used the workspace to keep repair follow-ups and document requests from slipping between our small team. It felt calmer than our old routine of scattered messages, and I could see who had the next step without asking around. That was a real help when calls and visitor arrangements were coming in together. The awkward moment came when a detail arrived in another work tool and needed to become a task here. The handoff was not as smooth as I expected; I had to check the other tool once to confirm the latest note before assigning the follow-up. No disaster, just one extra check at the busiest time. Compared with passing messages around, this still gave us a better shared picture, though I would not call the connection effortless. For an administrative role, knowing the owner and due date mattered more than having another polished view. Setup was straightforward enough for our small office, and I was glad to see the work settle into one place. Still, the integration pause keeps this at three stars. This helped, with room to improve.
Date of experience: Sep 04, 2026
Strong Workflow, Some Setup Friction
Getting routine office work organised was straightforward, and shared views helped.
Lists, boards and calendars gave staff a clear way to follow projects, though permissions needed more thought.
Overall, it worked well, though clearer access handling would help.
Date of experience: Sep 10, 2026
Useful visibility, but too much effort for routine checks
At our weekly property handoff, I am checking task owners and due dates across projects. The list and calendar views help, but switching between them is slowing a simple status check.
One shared place for assignments is useful. I am still explaining the layout to colleagues more often than our small operations team can spare.
Date of experience: Sep 01, 2026
FAQ
Asana FAQs
Teams that need a reliable core workflow for task and project coordination and want less process overhead usually get the best start.
Run a one-week pilot with one team and compare execution speed, handoffs, and communication clarity against your current setup.
Adoption usually slows when roles and ownership are unclear. Clear rules matter more than feature depth in early use.
Yes, keep legacy tools in place while the pilot team runs on the new tool for one workflow, then expand only if results are consistent.
Verify approval flow, access control, version expectations, and reporting reliability with the team that owns the process.
Create a one-month shortlist criteria list, then compare actual completion speed and update quality after every weekly cycle.
Trust and data
How we build software profiles
Catalog data
Software profiles can include software facts and public catalog information.
User reviews
Software reviews are submitted by users and moderated before publication.
Vendor updates
Claimed vendors can update profile details and respond to reviews.
This profile can include catalog facts, aggregate ratings, submitted software reviews, and vendor profile updates when available.
For Vendors
Manage this software profile
Claim this profile to update pricing, screenshots, features, and respond to reviews.